Guided data exploration

ABSTRACT

A system for exploring data receives the data from a database and indexes the data in a server. The system displays one or more selectable datasets from the indexed data, where the selectable datasets include a plurality of attributes. The system receives a selection of one of the plurality of attributes. The system then sorts the one or more attributes by level of interestingness relative to the selected attribute, and displays the sorted attributes.

CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application claims priority of Provisional Patent Application Ser.No. 62/054,517, filed on Sep. 24, 2014, the contents of which is herebyincorporated by reference.

FIELD

One embodiment is directed generally to a computer system, and inparticular to a computer system that provides analysis of data throughguided data exploration.

BACKGROUND INFORMATION

In recent years, computer systems have enabled individuals andorganizations to capture and store vast quantities of data. Theproliferation of data is sometime referred to as “big data”, which is anall-encompassing term for any collection of datasets so large or complexthat it becomes difficult to process using traditional data processingapplications.

The challenges of big data include analysis, capture, curation, search,sharing, storage, transfer, visualization, and privacy concerns. Theexistence of such large quantities of data has led to an ever increasingneed for improved systems and methods of analyzing and exploring data.

SUMMARY

One embodiment is a system for exploring data. The system receives thedata from a database and indexes the data in a server. The systemdisplays one or more selectable datasets from the indexed data, wherethe selectable datasets include a plurality of attributes. The systemreceives a selection of one of the plurality of attributes. The systemthen sorts the one or more attributes by level of interestingnessrelative to the selected attribute, and displays the sorted attributes.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a computer server/system in accordance withan embodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 2 is a flow diagram of the functionality of the guided dataexploration module of FIG. 1 and other elements in accordance with oneembodiment of the present invention.

FIG. 3 illustrates an example user interface displaying availabledatasets in accordance with one embodiment.

FIG. 4 illustrates an example user interface displaying the attributesshown as sorted “tiles” after the selection of the “wine sales” datasetof FIG. 3 in accordance with an embodiment.

FIG. 5 illustrates a graph of the interestingness in relation to thenormalized entropy in accordance with one embodiment.

FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of the functionality of the guided dataexploration module of FIG. 1 and other elements in accordance with oneembodiment of the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Embodiments of the invention provide guided data exploration. One of theembodiments generates a user interface that displays indexed datasets(i.e., collections of data or data records) and allows a user to selectone of the datasets. In response, the user interface displays attributesof the selected dataset in order of interestingness. The user can thenfurther select one or more values of the attributes, which results in arefining of the dataset to assist the user in the selection and displayof the desired data.

FIG. 1 is a block diagram of a computer server/system 10 in accordancewith an embodiment of the present invention. Although shown as a singlesystem, the functionality of system 10 can be implemented as adistributed system. Further, the functionality disclosed herein can beimplemented on separate servers or devices that may be coupled togetherover a network. Further, one or more component of system 10 may not beincluded. For example, for functionality of a user client, system 10 maybe a smartphone that includes a processor, memory and a display, but maynot include one or more of the other components shown in FIG. 1.

System 10 includes a bus 12 or other communication mechanism forcommunicating information, and a processor 22 coupled to bus 12 forprocessing information. Processor 22 may be any type of general orspecific purpose processor. System 10 further includes a memory 14 forstoring information and instructions to be executed by processor 22.Memory 14 can be comprised of any combination of random access memory(“RAM”), read only memory (“ROM”), static storage such as a magnetic oroptical disk, or any other type of computer readable media. System 10further includes a communication device 20, such as a network interfacecard, to provide access to a network. Therefore, a user may interfacewith system 10 directly, or remotely through a network, or any othermethod.

Computer readable media may be any available media that can be accessedby processor 22 and includes both volatile and nonvolatile media,removable and non-removable media, and communication media.Communication media may include computer readable instructions, datastructures, program modules, or other data in a modulated data signalsuch as a carrier wave or other transport mechanism, and includes anyinformation delivery media.

Processor 22 is further coupled via bus 12 to a display 24, such as aLiquid Crystal Display (“LCD”). A keyboard 26 and a cursor controldevice 28, such as a computer mouse, are further coupled to bus 12 toenable a user to interface with system 10.

In one embodiment, memory 14 stores software modules that providefunctionality when executed by processor 22. The modules include anoperating system 15 that provides operating system functionality forsystem 10. The modules further include a guided data exploration module16 for providing guided data exploration functionality, and all otherfunctionality disclosed herein. System 10 can be part of a largersystem. Therefore, system 10 can include one or more additionalfunctional modules 18 to include the additional functionality, such asan enterprise resource planning (“ERP”) module that generates ERP datato be explored by module 16. A database 17 is coupled to bus 12 toprovide centralized storage for modules 16 and 18 and store unstructureddata, structured data, etc.

Each module can include multiple modules. In one embodiment, module 16includes an indexing module that receives data from a database andindexes the data, a display module that displays one or more selectabledatasets from the indexed data, and a sorting module that receives aselection of one or more of the selectable datasets and sorts the one ormore attributes by level of interestingness.

FIG. 2 is a flow diagram of the functionality of guided data explorationmodule 16 and other elements in accordance with one embodiment of thepresent invention. In one embodiment, the functionality of the flowdiagrams of FIG. 2 and FIG. 6 is implemented by software stored inmemory or other computer readable or tangible medium, and executed by aprocessor. In other embodiments, the functionality may be performed byhardware (e.g., through the use of an application-specific integratedcircuit (“ASIC”), a programmable gate array (“PGA”), a fieldprogrammable gate array (“FPGA”), etc.), or any combination of hardwareand software.

At 202, unstructured or partially structured data is stored in database17 of FIG. 1. In one embodiment, the data is stored in an Apache Hive,which is a data warehouse infrastructure built on top of Hadoop forproviding data summarization, query, and analysis. However, any type ofunstructured or structured data can be received and stored at 202. Forexample, in one embodiment the data is a large amount of Twitter“tweets”. In one embodiment, the data is stored in a Hadoop DistributedFile System (“HDFS”).

At 204, metadata discovery is performed on the data from 202, and thedata is then enriched according to the results of metadata discovery. Inone embodiment, metadata discovery is performed to determine thenature/type of data from the data itself (e.g., is the data a number, ageo-code, etc.), including the cardinality of the data. In oneembodiment, the data discovery is performed by the “Endeca InformationDiscovery Studio Provisioning Service”, from Oracle Corp. The metadatadiscovery generates a list of metadata that feeds into a user interface.In one embodiment, the enrichment is not performed. In anotherembodiment, both the type discovery and enrichment is not performed.

Table 1 below provides some example metadata:

TABLE 1 Name Description id Value that uniquely identifies a dataset.collectionKey Name of the collection that contains the data for thisdataset. sourceType Where this dataset gets its data from. sourceNameThe name of the database/table/file that this dataset gets its datafrom. displayName This will be displayed as the dataset name descriptionDescription of the dataset. timesViewed The number of times this datasethas been viewed by a user. timesFavorited The number of times thisdataset has been favorited by a user.

At 206, the data from 204 is indexed into a server and published to auser interface. In one embodiment, the data is indexed at 206 as anEndeca index in an “MDEX” engine from Oracle Corp.

At 208, the user interface is generated that displays all availabledatasets/data records or catalog of datasets that are indexed on theserver. FIG. 3 illustrates an example user interface 300 displaying theavailable datasets at 301 in accordance with one embodiment. A total of675 datasets are available via the interface (not all shown in FIG. 3).Each dataset is selectable by the user. In one embodiment, only a singledataset may be available and shown at 208. A selection of one of thedatasets can also be received at 208. In one embodiment, a selection isnot required at 208.

In response to a selection of a dataset at 208, the attributes aresorted by level of interestingness at 210 and an “explorer” userinterface is generated at 212 for the selected dataset. The attributesof the dataset are listed for further exploration/selection. FIG. 4illustrates an example user interface 400 displaying the attributesshown as sorted “tiles” after the selection of the “wine sales” dataset305 of FIG. 3 in accordance with an embodiment. Example tiles include a“delivery date” tile 401, a “zip code” tile 402, a “date of delivery”tile 403, etc. Each tile summarizes a variable/attribute from theselected data set, and the tiles are sorted by order of interestingness(i.e., a computation of a predictor of how likely the user will findeach attribute, and the corresponding representative tile for thatattribute, interesting) so that the attributes that most explain thedataset are initially displayed. In one embodiment, as described indetail below, entropy is used to determine the sorting by levels ofinterestingness. In another embodiment, the representative tile aresorted alphabetically. In another embodiment, the representative tilesare listed in the order that the tiles occur in the data (i.e., nosorting).

User interface 400 further includes a list of available refinementsshown on the left side at 410. As part of the generation of tiles at212, the type of visualization (e.g., bar chart, graph, map, etc.) isalso determined. In one embodiment, a hard coded decision tree is usedto determine the type of visualization. In FIG. 4, each tile representsan attribute of a dataset (i.e., a column of database attributes). Auser can also zoom into a particular tile/column. Therefore, a user canhave at a glance a view of each particular column/tile that includes themetadata.

Referring again to FIG. 2, at 214 the user selects (or unselects) fromthe list of available refinements 410, one or more values from one ormore of the attributes, refining the datasets.

At 216, the attributes/tiles are again sorted by level ofinterestingness based on the current dataset, and the user interfaceshowing a revised set of selectable data records is generated at 212.214 and 216 can be repeated as many times as necessary so that theselection of the records from the dataset is iteratively refinable.

The embodiment of FIG. 2 is considered “univariate” because each columnis considered separately.

In one embodiment, entropy is used to determine the level ofinterestingness of tiles/attributes at 210 of FIG. 2. “Entropy” is ameasurement of the uncertainty in a random variable. The typical unit ofmeasure used with entropy is a “bit”. The more uncertain the outcome ofthe random variable, the more bits are needed to represent the differentvalues.

As an example, assume there is a need to record the outcome of anexperiment that can either be “1000” or “2000”. First, since there areonly two possible outcomes, there is no need for the entire memory(bit-wise) representation “1000” or “2000”. Instead, a convention of “0”to indicate the former and “1” to indicate the latter can be used. Thetrue representation of the outcome is therefore only 1 bit, and formsthe upper limit to the entropy of this random variable.

Second, if the probability of the experiment's outcome is known, theentropy value can be further diminished, since the uncertainty inherentof this variable has been reduced. For example, tossing an unbiased coinyields an equal 0.5 chance (probability) of a tails or heads outcome.Since the uncertainty is high, the entropy would reflect its highestvalue (i.e., 1). If, however, the outcome records whether women arepregnant or not, and it is known that pregnant women account for 5% ofthe women population, the entropy will drop and indicate a value of0.2864 bits.

Every attribute of the datasets, such as datasets 301 of FIG. 3, has itsown entropy value (also referred to as “self-information”) and denoteshow much information is given by this attribute. This information (alsoknown as “information gain”) can be determined based on the uncertaintyof the attribute. For example, if all the values of a particularattribute are the same (a single value outcome), the attribute carriesno signal, and therefore has zero information gain.

The entropy value calculated for a single attribute is a non-negativenumber and ranges from 0 up to log|x| (pronounced as “log of count ofx”), where |x| is the number of different values of this attribute. Forthe values of entropy to be expressed in bits, the logarithm is taken inbase 2. In such a case, for example, the column with four equallydistributed values carries log 4=2 bits of information. As a differentexample, for a variable whose outcome is always a zero, the variable hasonly one outcome value and carries no information, its entropy valuebeing log 1=0. If, to provide another example, x is denoting a uniformlydistributed value between 0 and 65536, there is high uncertainty of eachvalue. In this example, there are 65536=2¹⁶ outcomes and, hence, 16 bitsof entropy.

Some embodiments compute entropy as Shannon entropy according to thefollowing formula:

${H(X)} = {- {\sum\limits_{i = 1}^{n}\;{{p\left( x_{i} \right)}\log_{b}{p\left( x_{i} \right)}}}}$where H(X) is the entropy of variable X, index i loops over all possiblen outcomes, x_(i) represents the possible outcome, and p(x_(i)) is theprobability for outcome x_(i). In one embodiment, binary (base 2)logarithm is used, in which case the resulting entropy is measured inbits.

Since all probabilities are given as a value in the range between 0 and1, all log outcomes are negative, hence the negation outside thesummation.

In addition, the lower the probability of an outcome, the smaller theprobability value and hence the higher the log value. In other words,the infrequent occurring values are, in fact, the biggest contributorsto the entropy value.

Some embodiments may normalize the entropy by dividing it by log|n|,making the resulting normalized entropy fall in the range 0-1.

In general, entropy can be evaluated for any discrete variable. In thecase of numerical variables, the entropy can be either calculateddirectly (via the computationally-complex differential approach), or thedata can be discretized, or binned, to convert it into a categoricalvariable. The latter approach potentially causes marginal loss ofprecision, but gains a considerable simplicity and speed of computation.

In the discrete variable case, the probabilities are the frequencies ofthe attributes within the dataset. In one embodiment, high cardinalitydata (e.g., variables that have the number of different valuescomparable to the number of records in the system; product reviews is anexample of such high cardinality data, since every review can reasonablybe expected to be different) can be assumed to be uninteresting. In thecase of a variable that contains natural language text, term extractioncan be used to convert such high cardinality variable into a lowercardinality (and, thus, more interesting) variable.

In one embodiment, the use of entropy values includes calculating theentropy of every attribute of a dataset, normalized to a 0-1 range.Further uses include sorting of the attributes based on descending orderof an outcome of an interestingness function, with an attempt to giveprominence to the attributes that are more interesting, as describedbelow.

In general, what may be interesting for one data analyst (or scientist)may not be so interesting for another. However, there are two degeneratecases that are simply not interesting by their nature. On the low end ofthe entropy range (closer to 0) are attributes that hold only a singleoutcome. Intuitively, these type do not contribute to the overallunderstanding of the data set. Similarly, on the high end of the entropyvalues (closer to the normalized value of 1), exist high cardinalityattributes (e.g., a product inventory number column, which is expectedto be different for every product). Such attributes are not expected tocarry information either.

At the values above the low end degenerate case, interesting signalappears, signifying variation on the outcome of this variable.Similarly, there is interesting signal at the values below the high enddegenerate case.

Certain embodiments posit a way to translate the precisely-computedentropy into interestingness, by first applying the low-end and high-endcutoffs and then mapping the extreme (low and high) values of entropy tohigh interestingness, while mapping intermediate values to lowinterestingness.

FIG. 5 illustrates one possible graph of the interestingness in relationto the normalized entropy. In FIG. 5, the x-axis is the normalizedentropy from 0 to 1 with 0.5 being the minimum of the mapping curve. They-axis represents how interesting an attribute will be. In someembodiments the cutoffs for low and high levels of entropy are differentand could be tuned independently.

Since the values of entropy span from 0 to log|n|, where n is the numberof different outcomes (or values) for each particular column orattribute, comparing entropy values for the attributes with a differentnumber of outcomes can present a challenge. Some embodiments performentropy normalization by dividing entropy for each particular column bylog|n|. The values of normalized entropy fall between 0 and 1 and thuscan be compared directly.

For example, consider two columns with the same value of entropy 0.5. Ifthe first column contains only values “true” and “false”, it has n=2,and the normalized entropy is 0.5/log(2)=0.5. The same process appliedto another column with the same value of entropy 0.5 but with fourdifferent values would result in the normalized entropy 0.5/log(4)=0.25.In this example, two columns with the same value of entropy beforenormalization would have different values of normalized entropy and,thus, different interestingness.

Other embodiments may utilize different mappings of entropy tointerestingness. For example, a parabolic curve with the global minimumin the 0-1 range would also satisfy the above considerations.

Certain embodiments can apply different mappings of entropy tointerestingness based on each attribute type. For example, geocodes canbe considered always interesting, no matter the distribution of theirvalues.

Some embodiments allow users to dynamically modify the lists of theattributes that have been sorted according to their interestingness. Thepossibilities include user interface elements such as “remove” and“like” buttons, to correspondingly exclude and promote selectedattributes.

Some embodiments add the utilization of machine learning approaches tofurther determine the specific ranges/thresholds for the degeneratecases based on the interest shown by users.

The embodiments described above compute entropy for each attribute inisolation. In other embodiments, entropy calculations are performed atthe bivariate analysis level instead of the univariate level. Thisallows entropy to be computed between two different attributes (mutualand conditional entropy). In this embodiment, the user may select anattribute before the interestingness-based sorting. In this scenario,the entropy is computed and the interestingness is determined relativeto the selected column.

In another embodiment, the user may indicate an interest in an attributeor a set of attributes through some user gesture after the initialunivariate interestingness sort is performed. In this scenario,following this user gesture, the attributes of the data set arere-sorted, taking into account the new information.

For the bivariate embodiment, the entropy computation can be based onmutual information. For two attributes X and Y, the mutual information Ican be expressed as:

${{I\left( {X;Y} \right)} = {\sum\limits_{y \in Y}{\sum\limits_{x \in X}{{p\left( {x,y} \right)}{\log\left( \frac{p\left( {x,y} \right)}{{p(x)}{p(y)}} \right)}}}}},$where x and y are possible outcomes for attributes X and Ycorrespondingly; p(x) and p(y) are probabilities for outcomes x and ycorrespondingly; p(x, y) is the joint probability for outcomes x and yoccurring together (in the same row of data), and the double summationoccurs over all possible outcomes.

As an example for the bivariate embodiment, assume that the data hasfour attributes: x1, x2, x3, x4. Attributes may be discrete ornumerical, in which case they can be discretized via binning. For eachattribute, the relative entropy (mutual information) is computedrelative to the chosen attribute. If x1 denotes the chosen attribute,then for every other attribute x2, x3, x4, embodiments can computemutual information with respect to x1. The three attributes can then besorted according to the computed values of mutual information in respectto the selected column x1. For example, if the values of mutualinformation are I(x1, x2)=0.4; I(x1, x3)=0.6; I(x1, x4)=0.2, thensorting of the attributes according to this mutual information wouldresult in the following ordering of the attributes: x3, x2, x4. Otherembodiments might combine this sorting with other considerations. Forexample, if it is known that the attributes of city, state and zip codeare related to one another, such attributes could be kept togetherduring the sort process.

In another embodiment, conditional mutual information can be used, wherethe conditional mutual information in one example is the expected valueof the mutual information of two random variables given the value of athird.

FIG. 6 is a flow diagram of the functionality of guided data explorationmodule 16 and other elements in accordance with one embodiment of thepresent invention. FIG. 6 illustrates a bivariate embodiment. Theembodiment of FIG. 6 has similar functionality of the embodiment of FIG.2 at 202, 204, 206, 208, 210 and 212. At 614, a selection of a tile isreceived. At 616, the attributes are sorted by level of interestingnessrelative to the selected tile.

As disclosed, embodiments provide guided analysis for exploration ofdatasets. Attributes of a selected dataset are sorted by levels ofinterestingness, and a user, through an iterative process, can providefurther sorting.

Several embodiments are specifically illustrated and/or describedherein. However, it will be appreciated that modifications andvariations of the disclosed embodiments are covered by the aboveteachings and within the purview of the appended claims withoutdeparting from the spirit and intended scope of the invention.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method of exploring data, the methodcomprising: receiving the data from a database; indexing the data in aserver to generate a plurality of database datasets; displaying one ormore selectable database datasets of the plurality database datasetsfrom the indexed data, each of the selectable database datasetscomprising a plurality of database data records and a plurality ofattributes that correspond to columns of the database dataset, whereindata records of a given database dataset comprise values for one or moreattributes of the given database dataset; receiving a selection of oneof the selectable database datasets that corresponds to a firstplurality of attributes; receiving a selection of one of the firstplurality of attributes; in response to a selection of the attribute,determining bivariate entropy metrics for a remaining set of the firstplurality of attributes relative to the selected attribute, wherein thebivariate entropy metric for a given one of the remaining set of thefirst plurality of attributes is a function of joint probabilitiescalculated over different outcomes for the selected attribute anddifferent outcomes for the (liven attribute within the data records ofthe selected data set, given attribute probabilities calculated overdifferent outcomes of the given attribute within the data records of theselected data set, and selected attribute probabilities calculated overdifferent outcomes of the selected attribute within the data records ofthe selected data set; sorting the remaining set of the first pluralityof attributes that correspond to the selected dataset based on thedetermined bivariate entropy metrics; and displaying the sortedattributes of the selected dataset as selectable attributes.
 2. Themethod of claim 1, further comprising receiving a dynamic modificationof the sorted attributes using user interface elements to exclude orpromote sorted attributes.
 3. The method of claim 1, wherein at leastsome of the data in the database is unstructured data.
 4. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the displaying the sorted attributes comprisesdisplaying a tile for each sorted attribute, the tile comprising avisualization of the attribute.
 5. The method of claim 1, wherein thedetermining the bivariate entropy metric for the remaining set of thefirst plurality of attributes relative to the selected attributecomprises determining mutual information between each of the remainingset of the first plurality of attributes and the selected attribute. 6.The method of claim 1, wherein the determining the bivariate entropymetric for the remaining set of the first plurality of attributesrelative to the selected attribute comprises determining conditionalmutual information between each of the remaining set of the firstplurality of attributes and the selected attribute.
 7. The method ofclaim 1, wherein each of the attributes consists of a database columnand each of the database datasets corresponds to a database table. 8.The method of claim 1, wherein at least one of the remaining set of thefirst plurality of attributes comprises a numerical attribute withnumerical values within the data records of the selected data set, andwhen determining the bivariate entropy metric for the one of theremaining set of the first plurality of attributes, the numerical valuesare discretized into bins to covert the numerical attribute into acategorical attribute.
 9. The method of claim 1, further comprising:mapping the determined bivariate entropy metrics for each of theremaining set of the first plurality of attributes to a plurality ofsorting metrics by applying a high value cutoff and a low value cutoffto the determined bivariate entropy metrics, the sorting metricscomprising values between the high value cutoff and the low valuecutoff, wherein the sorting of the remaining set of the first pluralityattributes is based on the mapped sorting metrics.
 10. The method ofclaim 1, wherein the function of the joint probabilities, givenattribute probabilities, and selected attribute probabilities that isused to determine the bivariate entropy metric for the given attributecomprises a summation function that includes the joint probabilities,given attribute probabilities, and selected attribute probabilities, andthe summation function comprises a double summation over possibleoutcomes for the given attribute and the selected attribute within thedata records of the selected data set.
 11. A non-transitory computerreadable medium having instructions stored thereon that, when executedby a processor, cause the processor to provided guided data exploration,the providing comprising: receiving the data from a database; indexingthe data in a server to generate a plurality of database datasets;displaying one or more selectable database datasets of the pluralitydatabase datasets from the indexed data, each of the selectable databasedatasets comprising a plurality of database data records and a pluralityof attributes that correspond to columns of the database dataset,wherein data records of a given database dataset comprise values for oneor more attributes of the given database dataset; receiving a selectionof one of the selectable database datasets that corresponds to a firstplurality of attributes; receiving a selection of one of the firstplurality of attributes; in response to a selection of the attribute,determining bivariate entropy metrics for the first plurality ofattributes relative to the selected attribute, wherein the bivariateentropy metric for a given one of the remaining set of the firstplurality of attributes is a function of joint probabilities calculatedover different outcomes for the selected attribute and differentoutcomes for the given attribute within the data records of the selecteddata set, given attribute probabilities calculated over differentoutcomes of the given attribute within the data records of the selecteddata set, and selected attribute probabilities calculated over differentoutcomes of the selected attribute within the data records of theselected data set; sorting the remaining set of the first plurality ofattributes that correspond to the selected dataset based on thedetermined bivariate entropy metrics; and displaying the sortedattributes of the selected dataset as selectable attributes.
 12. Thecomputer readable medium of claim 11, the providing further comprisingreceiving a dynamic modification of the sorted attributes using userinterface elements to exclude or promote sorted attributes.
 13. Thecomputer readable medium of claim 11, wherein at least some of the datain the database is unstructured data.
 14. The computer readable mediumof claim 11, wherein the displaying the sorted attributes comprisesdisplaying a tile for each sorted attribute, the tile comprising avisualization of the attribute.
 15. The computer readable medium ofclaim 11, wherein the determining the bivariate entropy metric for theremaining set of the first plurality of attributes relative to theselected attribute comprises determining mutual information between eachof the remaining set of the first plurality of attributes and theselected attribute.
 16. The computer readable medium of claim 11,wherein the determining the bivariate entropy metric for the remainingset of the first plurality of attributes relative to the selectedattribute comprises determining conditional mutual information betweeneach of the remaining set of the first plurality of attributes and theselected attribute.
 17. The computer readable medium of claim 11,wherein each of the attributes consists of a database column and each ofthe database datasets corresponds to a database table.
 18. A guided dataexploration system comprising: a processor coupled to a storage devicethat stores instructions, the processor executing instructions togenerate modules comprising: an indexing module that receives data froma database and indexes the data in a server to generate a plurality ofdatabase datasets; a display module that displays one or more selectabledatabase datasets of the plurality database datasets from the indexeddata, each of the selectable database datasets comprising a plurality ofdatabase data records and a plurality of attributes that correspond tocolumns of the database dataset, that receives a selection of one of theselectable database datasets that corresponds to a first plurality ofattributes and that receives a selection of one of the first pluralityof attributes, wherein data records of a given database dataset comprisevalues for one or more attributes of the given database dataset; and adetermining module that, in response to a selection of the attribute,determines bivariate entropy metrics for a remaining set of the firstplurality of attributes relative to the selected attribute, wherein thebivariate entropy metric for a given one of the remaining set of thefirst plurality of attributes is a function of joint probabilitiescalculated over different outcomes for the selected attribute anddifferent outcomes for the given attribute within the data records ofthe selected data set, given attribute probabilities calculated overdifferent outcomes of the given attribute within the data records of theselected data set, and selected attribute probabilities calculated overdifferent outcomes of the selected attribute within the data records ofthe selected data set; a sorting module that sorts the remaining set ofthe first plurality of attributes that correspond to the selecteddataset based on the determined bivariate entropy metrics; wherein thedisplay module further displays the sorted attributes of the selecteddataset as selectable attributes.
 19. The system of claim 18, whereinthe determining the bivariate entropy metric for the remaining set ofthe first plurality of attributes relative to the selected attributecomprises determining mutual information between each of the remainingset of the first plurality of attributes and the selected attribute. 20.The system of claim 18, wherein the determining the bivariate entropymetric for the remaining set of the first plurality of attributesrelative to the selected attribute comprises determining conditionalmutual information between each of the remaining set of the firstplurality of attributes and the selected attribute.